I went to the city last week to apply for schools for Six. I flew up for a brief 36 hours having carefully mapped out my time so I’d be able to wander over to Geekymummy‘s house (who was kindly putting me up), have the following morning to take care of all the administrative details, possibly an hour or two for shopping and then dinner with a friend before flying home. It was all going to be very pleasant and efficient.
However, I got in a bit early and ended up being so incredibly efficient that I took care of all my school stuff that afternoon and thus had a WHOLE DAY to myself in the city with nothing to do. What utter bliss. I was very excited.
I slept late – half past eight (not quite sure what happened to the girl who considered getting up at noon an early start) and pottered around drinking tea in Geekymummy‘s cosy kitchen – they had all left for work (very brave of her to trust me not to run off with the family silver). It was pelting with rain outside and I was relying on public transport so I hatched a plan to shop for several hours, then visit an art museum and finally, daringly, to go to a grown up film all by myself. Whilst happily disposing of several hundred dollars between Zara and a shoe shop which was having a sale (had to buy two pairs, really, at that price) I got a text from my dinner companion-t0-be saying she was ill, so I had even more free time before my plane. Good grief! I was practically giddy with it! I quickly rejigged my plans to go to an evening talk at the gallery and sloped off to have lunch and then slipped into a downtown cinema to see The Social Network which everyone else has seen but me because I’ve been holed up in the boondocks with small kids.
I must say I had my worries when I was sitting watching the trailer. You know how they try and tailor them to the feature and this did not bode well. They were advertising a movie called SuckerPunch. This is what the director says about it: “The film follows a young girl in the 1950s about to be lobotomized as she attempts to escape an asylum with her inmate friends.” Gritty drama? No! Of course not. It’s a fantasy film that looks like a cross between a Russ Meyer movie, a violent video game and a manga sex cartoon. The eyeleashes and push-up bras alone were enough to make me physically wince and the high-flying kicks with freeze animation so you can look up the girls’ skirts from every angle was so blatant it was almost laughable. Although with an $85 million dollar budget I daresay they weren’t trying to crack a funny.
After a few more loud and boring previews the feature finally started. I enjoyed it. I really did. The story was fascinating and although one never really thought Mark Zuckerberg was exactly delightful, it’s quite interesting to see what a phenomenal shit he was to his friends. The thing that really stuck with me, though, was how women were portrayed in the film. There were a couple of actual characters who had some depth and were awarded some sort of moral compass, but for the most part the film was populated with half-naked girls, gyrating-in-their-knickers-on-tables-girls, public-convenience blow-job giving girls, falling-over-drunk-stupid girls, lingerie-clad-kissing each-other-for-boys’ titillation girls, psychotic-gift-burning-over-texting girls. Stereotype girls who either are there to fuck or make a scene. Many of these girls were purportedly Harvard students, but I note that they were not writing algorithms or studying or hacking or writing or thinking. Because they were too busy being hot and wearing lacy bras so they could fulfill the sexual fantasies of the male Harvard students. Or not fulfill the fantasies of Mark Zuckerberg. Whatever.
My sister is at the other big Ivy League university right now. I wonder if she is getting her best skivvies on for a free show-&-wiggle every Saturday night because that’s what all the cool girls do? I doubt it somehow, she’d consider all this type of thing beneath her, but I’m interested that so few young women seem offended by this kind of imagery, and in fact many participate happily in their own objectification mistaking it somehow for power?
I don’t know what can be done about this other than maintaining vigilance and continuing to voice discontent. I don’t want my daughter or my son growing up thinking that this kind of objectification is okay or normal, but it’s depressing to see how the tide has turned against women, often by our own hands just during my adult lifetime.
And where do you draw the line at home? Six is just becoming aware of her appearance and enjoys prancing around in front of the mirror making winning faces. Clearly she enjoys this – and she’s beautiful! Why not love that? I don’t want to tell her not to be interested in or like how she looks – it seems pretty normal to me. But how does one honour that and still make sure our daughters are engaged in their personal development so they are armed against the onslaught that is surely facing them and only getting worse?
Your thoughts, please!
{ 11 comments }
“…many participate happily in their own objectification mistaking it somehow for power…” – you put it so succinctly and brilliantly. I don’t know what can be done. I’m so glad I grew up when feminism was aggressive and had a point, and we thought we were fighting for something. And we WERE. How sad for this generation of young things who think they’re empowered because they can wear lacy underwear.
Trouble is, it’s a self-perpetuating circle. Everyone feels good when they look good (lacy underwear, nice haircut, new shoes, whatever it is). Do we feel good when we look good, or because we’ve been told that we feel good when we look good?
Sounds like you had a great time away (though I don’t quite understand why you were going to Geekymummyland to sign your child up for school – are you moving there? Have I missed something?)
I think it is almost impossible to prevent them from seeing it. My daughter is seven. She wants to listen to the music but I need to fight to stop her watching the videos all of which feature the same sort of girls that appear in the Social Network (I still haven’t seen it thanks to 7,4 & 1). But even if she doesn’t get it here then she gets it at school from the kids with older siblings. I want her to dance because she loves it but I don’t want her to think that what they do in those videos is how she should dance too. I just try and reinforce the positive role models she has around her in successful, beautiful women none of whom got there because of the state of their undies. No idea whether I will succeed or not and it scares me.
Nicola, you’re so right. How were we to know, when we made all those bold plans, that things would go so awry? I wonder if there is a difference between enjoying looking good (smart, elegant, professional, the thrill of new clothes) that both genders and all ages seem to feel and the specific thrill of enjoying the fleeting sense of power that one’s sexuality has impacted someone else. For young women, this is particularly heady and for girls, children, even more so – they come from having so little power and this how they’re taught to get it. ugh!
And yes, we’re moving to SF for a year in the summer! I didn’t announce it exactly, but we’re going.
Betty. I’m so sad that all the music they like is accompanied by this kind of imagary. Six, who doesn’t hear much radio pop, still likes ‘California Gurls” and sings “Six, on the beach, it’s got my dog on the stereo, WOOF WOOF”
I wonder how long this innocence can last? I also try to give her positive role models and consciously not seem overly concerned with her or my appearance, but I don’t know how successful this will be either.
You’re moving to SF? How exciting….I am thinking now we have to have that US bloggers meeting there next year!
I do fear for the next generation of girls. I think they should be reminded that close to 100 years ago women did not even have the vote. The Suffragette Network, anyone?
NVG, PLEASE let’s have the next US bloggers meeting in SF (this year, surely, or has the 2011 location already been set?)
The terrifying thing is that these girls think that expressing sexuality according to porn culture IS empowerment and liberation. Stockholm syndrome of a sort.
The girl-as-adornment/supplicant role is so rife and inbred to the culture that by the time they are sexually active they don’t even recognise their own enslavement to that thought system. AGHH! We need another revolution.
It was lovely to have you. Wonderful observations as always. I haven’t seen the movie but am disapointed that even Harvard students are portrayed this way. It is very easy to confuse sexuality with power. It can feel very powerful, it is very powerful, but surely it can be harnessed differently? A very gritty problem.
And yes, blogger meet up in SF would be fab!
Ugh – I have exactly these find of worries – not only for my little girl 2, but for my little boy 4 – I want him to grow up respecting women, not seeing them as something to spank or rub up against…
And it’s so tough – I remember feeling scared and intimidated by the whole concept of female beauty and femininity – I couldn’t get my head around being pretty AND smart for the longest time, so went to great lengths to make myself unattractive to avoid the issue, which certainly didn’t make me any happier. Then went the other way and did the bimbo thing, but not for long as it wasn’t my style, and let’s face it, I’m too loud & opinionated to masquerade as a bimbo for long 😉
I guess we teach them by example? By being the smart and gorgeous women we want them to grow up to emulate?
Anyone finds the answer – please do let me know!!!!
Newest Follower!
<3 your blog!
Its interesting, a lot of the mothers of girls that I know feel this way. I am constantly amazed at how few movies and books there are showing independent, intelligent, attractive women. And it is pervasive. I noticed something yesterday..I was in a toy store, looking for props for the theater, (trying to find a small plastic skunk and a dagger). I noticed that Barbie has gotten thinner. I was shocked. My hypothetical daughters are going to have to make do with thrift-store barbies… but it ties in to the whole ‘bimbo’ culture…. I’m not saying they should make ‘hairy-armpit hippie’ Barbies… but when the toys they play with are all modelled after thinness or bimbo-land… when the clothes in the stores all have ‘juicy’ on the butt, and the tv shows are mostly bimbettes in training…
And it is just so pervasive. I guess you do the best you can by example. Have a variety of dress-up clothes available, not just the stuff from the stores in the pink glittery crap, give Barbie a home office… there are some great kids books out there where the girls are active and feminine without being bimbos, so searching those books out, instead of the crud a lot of girls are reading these days about Rainbow Princesses. (I’m horrified at the series that are being marketed to kids, boys get dinosaurs and adventures, girls get fluffy rainbow Fairies). (Sorry this got so long…)
Catherine – I hope you found the plastic skunk.
So it’s SF for this year’s meet-up then? Great!
Unfortunately, I did not. Who knew a plastic skunk would be so hard to find?
Comments on this entry are closed.